Inheriting Various Assets
Overview: The Smith family consists of James (father), Sarah (mother), and their two adult children, Emily and Michael. Recently, James passed away, leaving behind a diverse array of assets that will be distributed to Sarah, Emily, and Michael. These assets include brokerage accounts, IRAs, Roth IRAs, a family home, and other investments.
---
Asset Breakdown and Tax Implications:
1. Brokerage Accounts:
· Inheritance: Brokerage accounts (such as stocks, bonds, and mutual funds) are inherited by Emily and Michael according to James’ will. Upon inheritance, the cost basis of these assets is “stepped up” to the fair market value on the date of James’ death. This means that any unrealized capital gains accumulated during James' lifetime are eliminated for tax purposes.
Tax Implications:
- When Emily and Michael sell the inherited securities, they will only pay capital gains tax on the difference between the stepped-up basis and the sale price.
- If they hold the assets for more than a year, any gains are subject to long-term capital gains tax rates, which are generally lower than short-term rates.
Key Consideration: There is no immediate tax liability upon inheriting these assets, but taxes are incurred when the assets are sold. The stepped-up basis reduces the potential tax burden.
---
2. Traditional IRAs:
· Inheritance: James’ traditional IRA is inherited by Emily and Michael. The IRS allows for a few different options in how beneficiaries can take distributions, depending on their age and relationship to the decedent.
· Tax Implications:
Distributions: Distributions from inherited traditional IRAs are taxed as ordinary income. The beneficiaries must begin taking required minimum distributions (RMDs) by December 31st of the year following James' death.
Stretch IRA Rule (for beneficiaries before 2020): Before the SECURE Act, beneficiaries could “stretch” RMDs over their lifetime. However, the SECURE Act changed this rule, requiring most beneficiaries (except spouses) to withdraw the entire balance within 10 years. For Emily and Michael, this means they must empty the account by the 10th year following James' death.
Early Withdrawal Penalty: There is no early withdrawal penalty on inherited IRAs, even if Emily or Michael are under the age of 59½.
Key Consideration: While RMDs are required for the 10-year period, the amount taken each year can vary. The tax burden depends on the annual distributions and the beneficiaries’ tax brackets.
---
3. Roth IRAs:
· Inheritance: Like traditional IRAs, Roth IRAs can be inherited by Emily and Michael. However, there is a key difference: qualified distributions from a Roth IRA are tax-free. Since James held the Roth IRA for more than five years, his beneficiaries can withdraw the funds without paying any taxes.
Tax Implications:
Distributions: Roth IRAs have no RMDs for the original account holder, and after death, beneficiaries must still take distributions. However, since Roth IRA distributions are generally tax-free, Emily and Michael will not owe taxes on any distributions from the inherited Roth IRA.
10-Year Rule: As with traditional IRAs, the beneficiaries must withdraw the entire balance within 10 years of James' death.
Key Consideration: The main advantage of inheriting a Roth IRA is that distributions are tax-free, offering an opportunity for tax-efficient wealth transfer.
---
4. Family Home (Real Estate):
· Inheritance: The Smith family home, appraised at $500,000 at the time of James’ passing, is inherited by Sarah and passed on to Emily and Michael per the estate plan.
· Tax Implications:
Step-Up in Basis: The cost basis of the home is stepped up to its fair market value on the date of James’ death. For example, if James originally bought the home for $250,000, the new cost basis would be $500,000.
Sale of the Property: If Emily and Michael sell the home immediately, they would not pay any capital gains tax because the sale price and stepped-up basis would be the same. However, if they hold the property for an extended period and sell it for a gain, they would pay capital gains tax on the difference between the stepped-up basis and the sale price.
Primary Residence Exclusion: If Emily or Michael decide to live in the home and meet the ownership and use tests (living in the home for at least 2 of the last 5 years before selling), they could exclude up to $250,000 ($500,000 for a married couple) of gain from taxation.
Key Consideration: The step-up in basis can significantly reduce the tax burden if the property is sold shortly after inheritance.
---
5. Other Assets (Personal Property, Life Insurance, and Business Interests):
Life Insurance: Life insurance proceeds are generally not subject to income tax. Emily and Michael would receive the payout tax-free, but if the policy has accumulated interest or dividends, that portion may be taxable.
Business Interests: If James owned shares in a family business, these would be inherited by Emily and Michael. The value of the business interests would receive a step-up in basis to their fair market value at the time of death. If they later sell the shares, the tax would be due on any appreciation since the date of inheritance.
Tax Implications: If Emily or Michael decide to sell their inherited business shares, they would pay capital gains tax on the difference between the stepped-up basis and the sale price.
---
Lifetime Exception and Estate Tax Considerations:
1. Lifetime Exception: The “lifetime exception” refers to the ability for beneficiaries to continue receiving tax-deferral benefits from certain inherited accounts. For example, the 10-year distribution rule (after the SECURE Act) allows for the deferral of taxes until the full distribution is made. However, Emily and Michael are not required to take distributions every year if they inherit a Roth IRA, as long as they take the full distribution within the 10 years.
2. Estate Taxes: The estate tax applies to estates valued above the federal estate tax exemption amount, which is $13.9 million per individual as of 2025. If James’ estate exceeds this threshold, the estate may be subject to estate tax. The estate’s assets, including brokerage accounts, IRAs, homes, and other investments, would be included in the gross estate value. It’s important to note that the lifetime exemption sunsets at the end of 2025 which would bring the amount down to approximately $7 million from almost $14 million.
· State Estate Taxes: Some states impose their own estate or inheritance taxes with much lower exemption amounts than the federal level. It is important for the Smith family to consider the specific laws in their state of residence to determine if any state taxes apply.
· New York state’s estate tax exclusion amount for 2025 is $7.16 million. Unlike the federal exemption any amount over the $7.16 million would subject the entire estate to estate tax – not just the excess.
---
Conclusion:
The Smith family’s inheritance of James’ assets comes with significant tax implications. Understanding the step-up in basis, the rules for inherited retirement accounts (such as IRAs and Roth IRAs), and the potential for estate taxes is critical for maximizing the value of the inheritance and minimizing taxes. Emily and Michael must plan carefully to ensure they are making the most of tax advantages and minimizing their liabilities. Consulting with a tax advisor and estate planning attorney is essential to navigate these complex issues.
Disclosures:
“The Pitti Group Wealth Management, LLC (“The Pitti Group”) is a registered investment advisor. Advisory services are only offered to clients or prospective clients where The Pitti Group and its representatives are properly licensed or exempt from licensure.”
“This case study is provided for illustrative purposes only to provide an example of the firm’s process and methodology. The results portrayed in this case study are not representative of all client situations or experiences. An individual’s experience may vary based on his or her individual circumstances and there can be no assurance that the firm will be able to achieve similar results in comparable situations. No portion of this case study is to be interpreted as a testimonial or endorsement of the firm’s investment advisory services. The information contained herein should not be construed as personalized investment advice.”
“The information provided is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor's particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon. You should consult your attorney or tax advisor.”